ACCURACY UNCOMPOSED: AGAINST CALIBRATIONISM
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
The Case Against Accuracy Estimationfor Comparing Induction
We analyze critically the use of classiica-tion accuracy to compare classiiers on natural data sets, providing a thorough investigation using ROC analysis, standard machine learning algorithms, and standard benchmark data sets. The results raise serious concerns about the use of accuracy for comparing classiiers and draw into question the conclusions that can be drawn from such studies. In the ...
متن کاملAccuracy Assessment of Protein-Based Docking Programs against RNA Targets
Ribonucleic acid (RNA) molecules play central roles in a variety of biological processes and, hence, are attractive targets for therapeutic intervention. In recent years, molecular docking techniques have become one of the most popular and successful approaches in drug discovery; however, almost all docking programs are protein based. The adaptability of popular docking programs in RNA world ha...
متن کاملThe Case against Accuracy Estimation for Comparing Induction Algorithms
We analyze critically the use of classi cation accuracy to compare classi ers on natural data sets, providing a thorough investigation using ROC analysis, standard machine learning algorithms, and standard benchmark data sets. The results raise serious concerns about the use of accuracy for comparing classi ers and draw into question the conclusions that can be drawn from such studies. In the c...
متن کاملComplexity in the case against accuracy estimation 3 Richard Nock
9 Some authors have repeatedly pointed out that the use of the accuracy, in particular for comparing classi2ers, is not adequate. The main argument concerns some assumptions of seldom 11 validity or correctness underlying the use of this criterion. In this paper, we study the computational burden of the accuracy’s replacement for building and comparing classi2ers, using 13 the framework of Indu...
متن کاملThe Case Against Abandoning the Search for Substantive Accuracy
Professor Slobogin’s new book, Proving the Unprovable, is the most provocative evidence text that I have read in years. In the book, he argues in favor of a more relaxed standard for admitting psychologists’ and psychiatrists’ testimony about a person’s prior mental state. He contends that a person’s earlier mental state is essentially unprovable and that it is impossible to gauge the validity ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Episteme
سال: 2017
ISSN: 1742-3600,1750-0117
DOI: 10.1017/epi.2016.50